Chinas Relationship with North Korea

chinawares Relationship with northmost KoreaTable of ContentsIntroduction possible action distinguishmentResearch QuestionsLiterature ReviewTheoretical framework (Defensive Realism-Kenneth Waltz)Sino-Korean league shared gain among mainland mainland chinaware and conglutination KoreaBeijings influenceConclusionIntroduction mating Korea is the state that is being considered as the most isolated state in the dry land. China is the only state that is financial backing nitrogen Korea since Korean war. At the period of Korean fight USSR and China backed matrimony Korea. S bulgeh Korea and coupling Korea are on the same peninsula whereas pairing Korea shares its fudges with China, Russia, Japan and Mongolia but does not save groovy transaction with any state except China. Trade impediments ask been enthr angiotensin-converting enzyme on wedlock Korea but China supported them throughout and declare as the biggest trade partner of North Korea. During the Korean War, S oviet substance provided forces assistance to North Korea but circumstances are sort of different now. As we are living in unipolar world and US is the super spot, China is threat to US because of its emerging sparingal and military violence. US supported southeast Korea in Korean War and they still lease ample transaction with each other. The reason of atomization of Korea is shift in ideology, North Korea was a Communist state and that is over again a threat to US because US didnt want several(prenominal) states that follow Communism. On the other hand China was and still is a Communist state and a cause of having a soft recessional for North Korea. South Korea is the Democratic state and has been backed by US. 1China is aiding capital of North Korea in impairment of both soft power and substantial power but does not want them to have their own military weapon. Proliferation of thermonuclear weapon may lead towards unhealthy relations amongst China and North Korea and off course US silently support this particular act of China against North Korea. From 2006-2013 Pyongyangs essay Nuclear Tests for the three times but it turned relations in tensed situation and settled afterwards when North Korea agreed on de atomicization at Six Table Talks. For now North Korea does not relent disturbed relations with China because its the only state that is providing stinting and military trade to them. When Korea split North Korea had better scrimping and gross domestic product than South Korea but now South Korea is more developed and flourished because of republic and support of US whereas North Korea being the follower of Communism and have Dictatorship has poor economy plus have non friendly relations with its neighbors. 2HypothesisNorth Koreas bond is grave to Beijing as an important tool of balancing power in the area with the US its affiliate, oddly South Korea rising Japan.Research QuestionsThe purpose of the study is to find out the ans wers of these questionsWhy North Korea is important for China in the regional circumstance of Asia Pacific?Will Sino-Korean compact be able to balance power with the United States its allies in the region?What is the Western Perception of Sino-Korean conjunction?Literature reviewAs China and North Koreas kinship is one of the ongoing debates for the world since Korean War so scholars the likes of to write about it and by giving different analysis on the particular issue makes the topic more interesting. The Congressional Report has been published on December 2010 by Dick. K. Nanto and Mark. E. Manyin. The main crux of the report was that US being the opponent of China still highlighted the mutual interests of Chinas contrary insurance form _or_ system of government towards North Korea. The reason behind that is China wants to acquire North Korea as a stabilized state in terminations of safe economy but does not want North Korea to stimulate a Nuclear power and this is the point where US is with China.The Book North Korea and North East Asia edited by Samuel. S Kim and Tai Hwan lee(prenominal) talks about Beijings continuous support to Pyongyang is its own interest because if it will stop the economic assistance to North Korea, then the complete dependence on China would affect the economy of China as well. Weak economy of North Korea means slight job opportunities and facilities of life. As North Koreans are not in not bad(predicate) terms with their neighbors except China they will start moving towards it, this idolize is making China to provide soft power to North Korea so they stay in their own state and not be tote up the refuges of China. at that distance is a report from Washington named as Chinas North Korean polity by Gates Bill published in 2011 and another report Balancing Chinese interests on North Korea and Iran by Lora Saalman (April 21013). In this report author has discussed that US, South Korea and Japan are allies but some how they are agreeing on Chinas foreign policy towards North Korea as it discussed aboutTo stable the regime and policy-making system of North KoreaDevelopment of their economyA book called China and North Korea by Andrew Scobell has discussed what terror PRC and DPRK faced after 9/11. In Chinas point of view after Iraq it was North Koreas turn to be attacked by US so in that case it was imperative for both states to come together on one table and maintain their National Security, the article Chinas North Korean Pivot published in 2013 by Yoon Young-Kwan added that Chinas perception was that Pyongyangs would agree on the issue of denuclearization when flowering Minister Wen Jibao visited North Korea in October 2009 and made sure the persistency of economic services.Theory Defensive Realism-Kenneth WaltzIn this study, I have applied the defensive realism school of thought. Defensive realist basically believes that power is the most important element in the external relations. Also , defensive realists fence that states are genuinely obsessed with security because they feel in cover and on that pointfore always seek to maximize its security capabilities. This is how China is developing and maintaining its relations with other states including North Korea in the region. China is insecure and doesnt imprecate US and its allies, and with the growing US presence in the Asia Pacific region in return has increased Chinas concerns, thus China is seeking to find a way to balance the power by supporting US rival North Korea.Sino-Korean allianceAs it is observed that China is of the strongest allied state of North-Korea, few things are being come under consideration in last few years. Some tensions have been occurred between China and North Korea relationship due to continuous nuclear development by North Korea, China and US are on the same platform to stop North Korea to become a Nuclear power. It is thought that US partnership towards North East Asia is a entranc e to bring stability in Korea peninsula. Since Obamas pivot to Asia the previous policy (regional partnership) has been confronted, and the changing policy of US is creating suspicion among Chinese Government.North Koreas border on is aggressive towards China and US, now North Korea is applying realistic come along as according to North Korea US is the only actor with utmost nuclear power and Pyongyang is trying to balance the power by developing their own Nuclear weapons.U.S-China policies are divergent in key out areas such as anti-terror and anti WMD institutes, democracy and human rights. The U.S alliance system and the U.N system contribute on stable patterns of power balancing in Asia-Pacific. I conclude that Sino-U.S policies on the regional order entrust in patterns of power balancing not undermined by co-existence and order that may be called Stable Instability, because it is likely to remain in place as the regional order of the Asia-Pacific for the foreseeable future .Western perception of Sino-Korean alliance Since China is the biggest trade partner of North Korea but its policy towards denuclearization of North Korea is very clear and supports US on this particular issue. Though US consider China as a threat but likewise realize that China is only providing soft power to North Korea and has a very firm stance on the issue of denuclearization of North Korea.At the start of the Obamas brass section first term in 2009, in that location were some(prenominal) expectations that the United States must pursue direct talks with North Korea in order to break a two decade big standoff over its nuclear program. President Obama promised in his inaugural spread over that he would put up an outstretched hand to those who will unclench their fists. Making a public offer to dictatorial states of willingness to abandon adversarial relations.3However North Korea responded to this offer with a multi-stage rocket launch and a nuclear test in April and May 2 009.These actions meant that president Obamas first North Korea connect policy decisions would be defined by the need to uphold the international nonproliferation regime against North Koreas challenge and would involve winning international support for sanctions against North Korea at United Nations security council. The resulting UNSC resolution 1874 condemned North Koreas nuclear and multi stage rocket tests and subjected suspected North Korea related shipments to international inspections. 4By the time Obamas administration had the political lay to pursue direct dialogue with North Korea it had decided on an approach that secretory of United State Clinton described as strategic interest group in close consultants with our six party allies. The emphasis alliances coordination has been the first article of faith of any Obama administration discussion policy towards North Korea and it was greatly help by the fact that Obama and Lee Myung-bak (former ruler of South Asia) adminis trations largely power saw eye to eye on the priority and importance of North Koreas denuclearization.5 The policy of strategic patience, a policy that suggested that the U.S could offend to await for North Korea to make its decision to denuclearize, aligned well with political human beings in light of North Koreas alleged sinky of a Korean warship and shelling of South Koreas Yeonpyeons Island in March and November 2010. The Obama administration held three rounds of direct talks with North Korean counterparts from July 2011 to February 2012.The U.S intended these statements to stick with North Korea from provocative actions such as nuclear and missile tests and to secure Pyongyangs commitment to return to the path of denuclearization, but they were tump over slight than three weeks after they were announced by North Koreas March 16, 2012 announcement of its failed 12 April 2012 satellite launch. Thus, the Obamas first term policy toward North Korea involved a mix of elements, including a strong commitment to coordination among some South Korean and Japanese allies, continued inclination to the objective of North Koreas denuclearization. The Obama administration also involved a rebalancing policy towards Asia, popularly known as pivot to Asia. This policy strengthens U.S political, economic and military participation in and commitment to Asia, both through a host of bilateral dialogues with China that cover a wide cheat of economic and strategic issues and through a variety of hedging measures designed to shape Chinas rise, limit the affects of assertive Chinese policies and check into that Chinas rise will not result in regional instability. This debate provides a backdrop to consider prospects for Sino-U.S cooperation on policy toward North Korea and highlights Chinese wariness and strategic mistrust of U.S policy intentions.6Mutual GainNorth Korea is economically dependent on China. China is its major food source and the North Koreas dependency on china is increasing day by day as its export is less than its import. It is not only North Korea that is benefitting from China but its a game of mutual gain North Korea is providing buffer zone between China and South Korea. More and more Chinese companies are expend in North Korea and gaining favorable interests.Importance of North Korea in Asia Pacific (China)ConclusionChina doesnt believe in making alliances or allies. China only seeks mutual interests and cooperation amongst states. Also, China perceives a threat from US and its Allies and so in order to balance out, China has been supporting North Korea since the Korean War in early 1950s. Moreover, there has been a mutual gain relation between North Korea and China. North Koreas economy is entirely dependent on China as China provided it with aid and energy supplies. Also, China is protecting and calming down its border against the Korean immigrants in China.However, China is surrounded by many challengers and so China sees North Korea as a buffer state against South Korea where 1000s of US military troops are settled. Also, there has been a great number of investments and infra-structure building in North Korea by Chinese firms and companies. And in return China is extracting mineral resources from North Koreas region. This way China is protecting and serving its own national interests magic spell also helping out the North Korean interests and raising many of its people out of poverty.BibliographyA.Snyder, Scott. U.S. Policy Toward North Korea. Council on contradictory Affairs, January 2013.Armenian, Red. Soviet-Empire.com. 26 January, 2011. http//www.soviet-empire.com/ussr/viewtopic.php?t=49753start=100 (accessed April 15, 2914).Dingli, Shen. Scribd. 2006. http//www.scribd.com/ doctor/85548815/Coping-With-a-Nuclear-North-Korea-and-North-Koreas-Strategic-Significance-to-China (accessed April 8, 2014).G.Sutter, Robert. Scribed. 2012. http//www.scribd.com/doc/101616305/Chinese-Foreign-Relations-Powe r-and-Policy-since-the-Cold-War (accessed April 16, 2014).Henderson, Barney. Sreaves32. March 29, 2013. https//sreaves32.wordpress.com/category/asiapacific/south-korea/ knave/6/ (accessed April 6, 2014).Meredith, Charlotte. Sreaves32. April 9, 2013. http//sreaves32.wordpress.com/2013/04/09/north-korea-to-launch-missile-april-10-2013-after-warning-foreigners-to-evacuate-south/ (accessed April 5, 2014).Newsreview.com. March 15, 2014. http//www.newsreview.com/reno/newsview/blogs?date=2013-09-01?utm_source=luvcelebs.com (accessed April 10, 2014).NORTH KOREA SAYS IT WILL LAUNCH A NUCLEAR ATTACK ON THE UNITED STATES. March 11, 2013. http//sreaves32.wordpress.com/2013/03/11/north-korea-says-it-will-launch-a-nuclear-attack-on-the-united-states/ (accessed April 9, 2014).Odgard, Liselotte. The remnant of Power in Asia-Pacific Security. Routledge, January 2007.shree Bajoria, Beina Xu. Council on Foreign Relations. Febuary 18, 2014. http//www.cfr.org/china/china-north-korea-relationship/p11097 (accessed April 10, 2014).Xu, Jayshree Bajoria and Beina. Indias Strategic Studies. Febuary 21, 2013. http//strategicstudyindia.blogspot.com/2013/02/the-china-north-korea-relationship_26.html (accessed April 16, 2014).1 Dingli, Shen. Scribd. 2006. http//www.scribd.com/doc/85548815/Coping-With-a-Nuclear-North-Korea-and-North-Koreas-Strategic-Significance-to-China (accessed April 8, 2014).2 Armenian, Red. Soviet-Empire.com. 26 January, 2011. http//www.soviet-empire.com/ussr/viewtopic.php?t=49753start=100 (accessed April 15, 2914).3 A.Snyder, Scott. U.S. Policy Toward North Korea. Council on Foreign Affairs, January 2013.4 Henderson, Barney. Sreaves32. March 29, 2013. https//sreaves32.wordpress.com/category/asiapacific/south-korea/page/6/ (accessed April 6, 2014).5 Newsreview.com. March 15, 2014. http//www.newsreview.com/reno/newsview/blogs?date=2013-09-01?utm_source=luvcelebs.com (accessed April 10, 2014).6 A.Snyder, Scott. U.S. Policy Toward North Korea. Council on Foreign Affairs, January 2013.